The MSM Jazz Department ends its 2009-2010 season

On April 21 and 22, The Moores School of Music Jazz Department will give its final concerts of the year with saxophonist Bill Evans. This concert marks Evans’s return appearance with the Moores School Jazz Orchestra since they last performed together for the 2009 MSM Jazz Festival.  Together, they will be playing selections from Evans’s latest album, Vans Joint. Check out "Soulbop" below for a sample.

[youtube=http://youtu.be/sME-9tvMA0w]

Wednesday, April 21 at 7:30 in the Moores School of Music Opera House click here for ticket information

Thursday, April 22 at 6pm at Miller Outdoor Theater Kicking off Waste Management’s four-day “Houston Celebrates Earth Day” Festival, presented in part with Da Camera and Whole Foods Market.

Admission is FREE!

A musician's tools

A lot of people identify improvisation in music with speaking a language. I wholeheartedly agree with this metaphor, but it may be a bit over-used at this point. Instead, I like to think of improvising (and playing music in general) to that other favorite pastime of mine: carpentry. Consider the following:

A carpenter is often encountered with problems that must be solved by building things. Sometimes this involves building something new, from scratch. Sometimes this involves fixing something broken, with both old and new materials.

A carpenter uses tools to create the visions he sees in his head.

A carpenter uses technique to control the tools to do the job that he wills them to do. Good technique allows him to vary the force, angle, speed and precision of each tool he is controlling to get the appropriate result.

A good carpenter never allows the tools to control what he does or how he works.

A carpenter is often working with materials that must be shaped into various forms and permutations so that they may work with other pieces of the puzzle to be completed. If one piece doesn't fit, then it must be adjusted to work with the rest of the pieces.

The final product is the only thing that matters. If a carpenter's tools and technique are in good working order, then (and only then) will the completed work look appealing. Good tools do not guarantee good work, and good technique suffers if the tools are insufficient.

This philosophy of solving problems cleared up many doubts and questions in my mind when I finally figured it out. Many young musicians are initially frustrated by the amount of tools and technique needed to perform well. This is understandable and quite common, but everyone must acquire the necessary tools and skills in order to create a competent musical idea. Likewise, many players become obsessed with the idea of the tools and techniques as the final product. This is unfortunate. If I were constantly infatuated with my hammer's design, I would never accomplish anything as a carpenter. If I were constantly fascinated by the way that I was able to cut crown molding at a particular angle, all I would have to show for it would be many separate pieces of wood cut at various angles. It wouldn't add up to anything meaningful or significant. You must have both in order to complete the final task, which is the only thing that has any real value.

Have you been to a Home Depot lately? Have you seen how many tools are in that place? How many do you have in your arsenal? How are you using them?

Miscellaneous:The lamest edit wars

If you don't own or haven't heard of The Visual Miscellaneum by David McCandless, I highly recommend that you purchase it immediately. Or at least subscribe to his blog. It's the ultimate coffee table book. It has the power to inform, amaze and even spur conversation (or debate) amongst you and your guests. Oh, and everything is presented with a lovely layout. You must see it to know what I mean. Anyhow, I was thumbing through this today and came across his page on the Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars. And if you have time to kill, I highly suggest you read this shrine to insignificance (insignifica?). I suppose that there's something for everyone here, but I particularly enjoy the debate over the Pink Floyd song, "Money".

"Sure, it's a song with an odd rhythm, but what exactly is the time signature? The band, which has no musical training, have said 7/8, most people say 7/4, experts will go as far as to say 21/8."

I just like the bari sax solo, personally. But what the hell... 7/4.

"Jazz": A bad word?

Read David Adler's post on pop music crossing over into jazz territory. Adler brings up a trend that interests me. I touched on the idea of the "new standards" way back in December, and this article treads close to my point. I must admit that I'm often surprised when untrained ("pop"?) musicians don't know their seventh and ninth chords, but I've always assumed this as a result from a lack of formal musical training. While I think this is sometimes the case, I also understand that most pop music rarely ventures into "extended" or "chromatic" harmony to the extent that jazz music does. Although, after reading this, I guess I'm half right. Why?

The main point that interests me in Adler's article is the mention of the session musicians that played on many recordings of the late 1970s and early 80s. An accomplished jazz musician can play anything. Literally anything. That explains all the great Motown recordings and Philly soul recordings, but what about rock music? It seems like the word "jazz" is instantaneously synonymous with "prog" or "smooth" rock/pop music of this era (also known as "yacht rock"). Yuck. Jazz has become a bad word. And for this, I am deeply shamed.

Allow me to demonstrate: I'm in my late twenties. I (clearly) do not like Steely Dan, but I (obviously) love Stevie Wonder. While both are incredibly similar in terms of harmony and song construction, they stand apart in terms of aesthetics and taste. Both use jazz chords and unusual progressions, but how often do you hear a Stevie Wonder song song played across all genres of music as compared to Steely Dan? Who speaks to a larger audience? Who will continue to do so?

Some artists use their knowledge and musical ability to write tasteful pop music that crosses over to a more general audience. This idea is no different from the Tin Pan Alley writers in the early 20th century. Simply put, popular music gets played. This is what I consider to be a significant quality of the "new standards": communication.